Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Innosilicon A4 Dominator

Innosilicon A4 Dominator

Taux de hachage 280.0 MH/s Puissance 1,050 W Efficiency 3,750,000.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Taux de hachage 33.0 TH/s Puissance 2,600 W Efficiency 78.8 J/TH

Innosilicon A4 Dominator vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A4 Dominator Specification Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+
280.0 MH/s Taux de hachage 33.0 TH/s
1,050 W Consommation électrique 2,600 W
3,750,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 78.8 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
9,200.0 kg Weight 10,000.0 kg
3,583 BTU/hr BTU Output 8,871 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Scrypt Algorithme SHA-256
Innosilicon Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A4 Dominator

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.52
Daily Profit -$2.52
Monthly -$75.60
Yearly -$919.80

Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Daily Revenue 0.00001519 BTC $1.19
Daily Electricity -$6.24
Daily Profit -$5.05
Monthly -$151.58
Yearly -$1,844.26

Based on BTC price of $78,179 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 11785614% more hashrate (0.0 vs 33.0 TH/s). The Innosilicon A4 Dominator holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ — l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A4 Dominator and Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ sit on each measurable spec:

  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 11785614% more hashrate (0.0 vs 33.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon A4 Dominator 60% better power draw (1,050 vs 2,600 W)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 100% better efficacité (3,750,000.0 vs 78.8 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon A4 Dominator 8% better weight (9,200 vs 10,000 kg)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 148% more heat output (3,583 vs 8,871 BTU/hr)
  • Innosilicon A4 Dominator 41% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 22.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon A4 Dominator

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

78.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Innosilicon A4 Dominator or Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A4 Dominator is more profitable at $-2.52/day compared to $-5.05/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Innosilicon A4 Dominator or Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Innosilicon A4 Dominator vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+: which fits a residential setup better?

The Innosilicon A4 Dominator scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Innosilicon A4 Dominator and Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ on J/TH?

The Innosilicon A4 Dominator runs at 3,750,000.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ runs at 78.8 J/TH — a difference of 3,749,921.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (3,750,000.0 vs 78.8 J/TH).