Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs IceRiver KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Specification | IceRiver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 720.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 8.0 TH/s |
| 1,300 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 1,805,555.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 400.0 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.5 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AE2 720Mh
IceRiver KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,171 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le IceRiver KS3 l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 1111011% more hashrate (0.0 vs 8.0 TH/s) in the IceRiver KS3's favour. The Iceriver AE2 720Mh holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver AE2 720Mh and IceRiver KS3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS3 1111011% more hashrate (0.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 59% better power draw (1,300 vs 3,200 W)
- IceRiver KS3 100% better efficacité (1,805,556 vs 400 J/TH)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 20% better noise (60.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS3 7% better weight (15.5 vs 14.4 kg)
- IceRiver KS3 146% more heat output (4,436 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 44% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Metric | IceRiver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,595 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $10,000 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$7.39 |
| -$2,734 | Net after 1 year | -$12,698 |
| -$3,873 | Net after 2 years | -$15,396 |
| -$5,011 | Net after 3 years | -$18,094 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver AE2 720MhScore: 52/100. 60 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS3400.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or IceRiver KS3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh is more profitable at $-3.12/day compared to $-7.39/day for the IceRiver KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs IceRiver KS3: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh is quieter at 60 dB compared to the IceRiver KS3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or IceRiver KS3?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs IceRiver KS3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh runs at 1,805,555.6 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,805,155.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,805,556 vs 400 J/TH).