Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 720.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 200.0 GH/s |
| 1,300 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 1,805,555.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 500.0 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 15.5 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AE2 720Mh
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,237 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficacité (1,805,556 vs 500 J/TH). The Iceriver AE2 720Mh claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver AE2 720Mh and Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 27678% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 92% better power draw (1,300 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 100% better efficacité (1,805,556 vs 500 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 84% better weight (15.5 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 1200% more heat output (4,436 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 44% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $1,595 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $79 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$2,734 | Net after 1 year | -$164 |
| -$3,873 | Net after 2 years | -$249 |
| -$5,011 | Net after 3 years | -$334 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver AE2 720MhScore: 52/100. 60 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-3.12/day for the Iceriver AE2 720Mh. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh is quieter at 60 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh runs at 1,805,555.6 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,805,055.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,805,556 vs 500 J/TH).