Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh vs Iceriver KAS KS5M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS5M |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 15.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 2,000,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 226.7 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 64/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh
Iceriver KAS KS5M
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KAS KS5M comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 29999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 15.0 TH/s). The Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh and Iceriver KAS KS5M sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 29999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 15.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 100% better efficacité (2,000,000 vs 227 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh 33% better noise (50.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh 83% better weight (2.5 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 3300% more heat output (341 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh 78% more score de minage domestique (64.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS5M |
|---|---|---|
| $280 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $449 |
| -$0.24 | Daily net profit | -$7.62 |
| -$368 | Net after 1 year | -$3,230 |
| -$455 | Net after 2 years | -$6,012 |
| -$543 | Net after 3 years | -$8,793 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALEO AE0 50MhScore: 64/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS5M226.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh or the Iceriver KAS KS5M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh is more profitable at $-0.24/day compared to $-7.62/day for the Iceriver KAS KS5M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh or Iceriver KAS KS5M?
The Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS5M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh or Iceriver KAS KS5M?
The Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KAS KS5M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh vs Iceriver KAS KS5M: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh runs at 2,000,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS5M runs at 226.7 J/TH — a difference of 1,999,773.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (2,000,000 vs 227 J/TH).