Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs IceRiver KS0 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Specification | IceRiver KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 300.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 200.0 GH/s |
| 500 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 1,666,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 500.0 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 4.0 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite
IceRiver KS0 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le IceRiver KS0 Pro l'emporte sur 6 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 500 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite and IceRiver KS0 Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 66567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 80% better power draw (500 vs 100 W)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 500 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 22% better noise (45.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 38% better weight (4.0 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 400% more heat output (1,706 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 15% more score de minage domestique (62.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Metric | IceRiver KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $979 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$1.20 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$1,417 | Net after 1 year | -$284 |
| -$1,855 | Net after 2 years | -$369 |
| -$2,293 | Net after 3 years | -$454 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0 ProScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS0 Pro500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or the IceRiver KS0 Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-1.20/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or the IceRiver KS0 Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite at 45 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs IceRiver KS0 Pro: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 62/100 for the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite and IceRiver KS0 Pro?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite runs at 1,666,666.7 J/TH while the IceRiver KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,666,166.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 500 J/TH).