Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 300.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 500 W | Consommation électrique | 500 W |
| 1,666,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 4.0 kg | Weight | 5.0 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 3 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 250 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite and Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 666567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 20% better weight (4.0 vs 5.0 kg)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| $979 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $458 |
| -$1.20 | Daily net profit | -$1.13 |
| -$1,417 | Net after 1 year | -$870 |
| -$1,855 | Net after 2 years | -$1,281 |
| -$2,293 | Net after 3 years | -$1,693 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is more profitable at $-1.13/day compared to $-1.20/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite runs at 1,666,666.7 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,666,416.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 250 J/TH).