Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Goldshell DG Card
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Specification | Goldshell DG Card |
|---|---|---|
| 580.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 80.0 MH/s |
| 942 W | Consommation électrique | 65 W |
| 1,624,137.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 812,500.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 4,400.0 kg | Weight | 0.3 kg |
| 3,214 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
Goldshell DG Card
Based on BTC price of $78,223 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell DG Card edges it: 5 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 93% better power draw (942.0 vs 65.0 W) in the Goldshell DG Card's favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and Goldshell DG Card actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 625% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell DG Card 93% better power draw (942.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Goldshell DG Card 50% better efficacité (1,624,138 vs 812,500 J/TH)
- Goldshell DG Card 100% better weight (4,400.0 vs 0.3 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 1349% more heat output (3,214 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell DG Card 129% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Metric | Goldshell DG Card |
|---|---|---|
| $1,190 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $113 |
| -$2.26 | Daily net profit | -$0.16 |
| -$2,015 | Net after 1 year | -$170 |
| -$2,840 | Net after 2 years | -$227 |
| -$3,666 | Net after 3 years | -$284 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell DG CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell DG Card812,500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Goldshell DG Card: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell DG Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-2.26/day for the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or the Goldshell DG Card better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell DG Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Goldshell DG Card: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell DG Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and Goldshell DG Card?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) runs at 1,624,137.9 J/TH while the Goldshell DG Card runs at 812,500.0 J/TH — a difference of 811,637.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 50% better efficacité (1,624,138 vs 812,500 J/TH).