Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Elphapex DG1 Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Specification | Elphapex DG1 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 580.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 11.0 GH/s |
| 942 W | Consommation électrique | 3,410 W |
| 1,624,137.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 310,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 4,400.0 kg | Weight | 18.3 kg |
| 3,214 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,635 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Elphapex |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
Elphapex DG1 Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,095 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Elphapex DG1 Lite, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 1797% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and Elphapex DG1 Lite sit on each measurable spec:
- Elphapex DG1 Lite 1797% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 72% better power draw (942 vs 3,410 W)
- Elphapex DG1 Lite 81% better efficacité (1,624,138 vs 310,000 J/TH)
- Elphapex DG1 Lite 100% better weight (4,400.0 vs 18.3 kg)
- Elphapex DG1 Lite 262% more heat output (3,214 vs 11,635 BTU/hr)
- Elphapex DG1 Lite 16% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Metric | Elphapex DG1 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $1,190 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.26 | Daily net profit | -$8.18 |
| -$2,015 | Net after 1 year | -$2,987 |
| -$2,840 | Net after 2 years | -$5,974 |
| -$3,666 | Net after 3 years | -$8,961 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Elphapex DG1 LiteScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Elphapex DG1 Lite310,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or the Elphapex DG1 Lite?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) is more profitable at $-2.26/day compared to $-8.18/day for the Elphapex DG1 Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or the Elphapex DG1 Lite better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Elphapex DG1 Lite is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or the Elphapex DG1 Lite?
The Elphapex DG1 Lite scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Elphapex DG1 Lite: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) runs at 1,624,137.9 J/TH while the Elphapex DG1 Lite runs at 310,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,314,137.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficacité (1,624,138 vs 310,000 J/TH).