Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) vs Elphapex DG1S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) | Specification | Elphapex DG1S |
|---|---|---|
| 16.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 10.0 GH/s |
| 3,360 W | Consommation électrique | 3,100 W |
| 210,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 310,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| — | Weight | 25.0 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,577 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 50/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Elphapex |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh)
Elphapex DG1S
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 60% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Elphapex DG1S isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) and Elphapex DG1S sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) 60% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Elphapex DG1S 8% better power draw (3,360 vs 3,100 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) 32% better efficacité (210,000 vs 310,000 J/TH)
- Elphapex DG1S 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) 8% more heat output (11,464 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
- Elphapex DG1S 39% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 50.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) | Metric | Elphapex DG1S |
|---|---|---|
| $3,199 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,800 |
| -$8.06 | Daily net profit | -$7.44 |
| -$6,142 | Net after 1 year | -$5,515 |
| -$9,085 | Net after 2 years | -$8,231 |
| -$12,028 | Net after 3 years | -$10,946 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Elphapex DG1SScore: 50/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh)210,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) vs Elphapex DG1S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Elphapex DG1S is more profitable at $-7.44/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) or the Elphapex DG1S better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Elphapex DG1S is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) or Elphapex DG1S?
The Elphapex DG1S scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) and Elphapex DG1S?
The Bitmain Antminer L9 (16Gh) runs at 210,000.0 J/TH while the Elphapex DG1S runs at 310,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 100,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 32% better efficacité (210,000 vs 310,000 J/TH).