Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer S3 |
|---|---|---|
| 53.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 478.0 GH/s |
| 2,385 W | Consommation électrique | 366 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 765.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 5,200.0 kg |
| 8,138 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,249 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)
Bitmain Antminer S3
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th), which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 10988% more hashrate (53.0 vs 0.5 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer S3 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) and Bitmain Antminer S3 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) 10988% more hashrate (53.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S3 85% better power draw (2,385 vs 366 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) 94% better efficacité (45.0 vs 765.7 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S3 45% better weight (9,500 vs 5,200 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) 552% more heat output (8,138 vs 1,249 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer S3 31% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer S3 |
|---|---|---|
| $274 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.82 | Daily net profit | -$0.86 |
| -$1,667 | Net after 1 year | -$314 |
| -$3,060 | Net after 2 years | -$629 |
| -$4,453 | Net after 3 years | -$943 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer S3Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)45.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) or Bitmain Antminer S3 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S3 is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-3.82/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) or the Bitmain Antminer S3 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) or Bitmain Antminer S3?
The Bitmain Antminer S3 scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) vs Bitmain Antminer S3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (53Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer S3 runs at 765.7 J/TH — a difference of 720.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 94% better efficacité (45.0 vs 765.7 J/TH).