Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 56.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 10.5 TH/s |
| 2,520 W | Consommation électrique | 1,432 W |
| 45.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 136.4 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9,500.0 kg | Weight | 4,200.0 kg |
| 8,598 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,886 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th)
Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,194 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 433% more hashrate (56.0 vs 10.5 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) and Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) 433% more hashrate (56.0 vs 10.5 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 43% better power draw (2,520 vs 1,432 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) 67% better efficacité (45.0 vs 136.4 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 56% better weight (9,500 vs 4,200 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) 76% more heat output (8,598 vs 4,886 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 41% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $413 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $955 |
| -$4.03 | Daily net profit | -$3.06 |
| -$1,885 | Net after 1 year | -$2,072 |
| -$3,357 | Net after 2 years | -$3,188 |
| -$4,829 | Net after 3 years | -$4,305 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th)45.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) is more profitable at $-3.06/day compared to $-4.03/day for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) or Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)?
The Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) and Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S17 (56Th) runs at 45.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) runs at 136.4 J/TH — a difference of 91.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 67% better efficacité (45.0 vs 136.4 J/TH).