Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| 140.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 158.0 TH/s |
| 3,010 W | Consommation électrique | 5,451 W |
| 21.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 34.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| 14,500.0 kg | Weight | 15.8 kg |
| 10,270 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 18,599 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 51/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th)
Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro
Based on BTC price of $78,143 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) et le Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) and Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro 13% more hashrate (140 vs 158 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) 45% better power draw (3,010 vs 5,451 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) 38% better efficacité (21.5 vs 34.5 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro 100% better weight (14,500.0 vs 15.8 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro 81% more heat output (10,270 vs 18,599 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro 132% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 51.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| $522 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.19 | Daily net profit | -$7.40 |
| -$1,321 | Net after 1 year | -$2,701 |
| -$2,120 | Net after 2 years | -$5,403 |
| -$2,920 | Net after 3 years | -$8,104 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer T19 HydroScore: 51/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th)21.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) or Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) is more profitable at $-2.19/day compared to $-7.40/day for the Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) or the Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) or Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro?
The Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro scores 51/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) vs Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer S19 XP (140Th) runs at 21.5 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer T19 Hydro runs at 34.5 J/TH — a difference of 13.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 38% better efficacité (21.5 vs 34.5 J/TH).