Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9i
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) | Specification | Ebang Ebit E9i |
|---|---|---|
| 310.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 13.5 TH/s |
| 5,270 W | Consommation électrique | 1,420 W |
| 17.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 105.2 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.8 kg | Weight | 5,500.0 kg |
| 17,981 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,845 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Ebang |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th)
Ebang Ebit E9i
Based on BTC price of $78,193 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th), which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 2196% more hashrate (310.0 vs 13.5 TH/s). The Ebang Ebit E9i claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) and Ebang Ebit E9i sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) 2196% more hashrate (310.0 vs 13.5 TH/s)
- Ebang Ebit E9i 73% better power draw (5,270 vs 1,420 W)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) 84% better efficacité (17.0 vs 105.2 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) 100% better weight (12.8 vs 5,500.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) 271% more heat output (17,981 vs 4,845 BTU/hr)
- Ebang Ebit E9i 3% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) | Metric | Ebang Ebit E9i |
|---|---|---|
| $1,679 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$1.49 | Daily net profit | -$2.92 |
| -$2,224 | Net after 1 year | -$1,067 |
| -$2,769 | Net after 2 years | -$2,133 |
| -$3,314 | Net after 3 years | -$3,200 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Ebang Ebit E9iScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th)17.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) vs Ebang Ebit E9i: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) is more profitable at $-1.49/day compared to $-2.92/day for the Ebang Ebit E9i. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) or Ebang Ebit E9i?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Ebang Ebit E9i at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) or Ebang Ebit E9i?
The Ebang Ebit E9i scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) and Ebang Ebit E9i?
The Bitmain Antminer S21e Hyd (310Th) runs at 17.0 J/TH while the Ebang Ebit E9i runs at 105.2 J/TH — a difference of 88.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 84% better efficacité (17.0 vs 105.2 J/TH).