Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) vs Whatsminer M50S+
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) | Specification | Whatsminer M50S+ |
|---|---|---|
| 88.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 138.0 TH/s |
| 3,344 W | Consommation électrique | 3,276 W |
| 38.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 23.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | 13.0 kg |
| 11,410 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,178 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)
Whatsminer M50S+
Based on BTC price of $78,005 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M50S+, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 38% better efficacité (38.0 vs 23.7 J/TH) in the Whatsminer M50S+'s favour. That said, the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) and Whatsminer M50S+ sit on each measurable spec:
- Whatsminer M50S+ 57% more hashrate (88.0 vs 138.0 TH/s)
- Whatsminer M50S+ 2% better power draw (3,344 vs 3,276 W)
- Whatsminer M50S+ 38% better efficacité (38.0 vs 23.7 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M50S+ 100% better weight (14,200.0 vs 13.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) 2% more heat output (11,410 vs 11,178 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M50S+ 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) | Metric | Whatsminer M50S+ |
|---|---|---|
| $596 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,500 |
| -$4.87 | Daily net profit | -$2.91 |
| -$2,372 | Net after 1 year | -$4,562 |
| -$4,149 | Net after 2 years | -$5,623 |
| -$5,925 | Net after 3 years | -$6,685 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50S+Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M50S+23.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) or Whatsminer M50S+ more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50S+ is more profitable at $-2.91/day compared to $-4.87/day for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) or Whatsminer M50S+?
The Whatsminer M50S+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) or Whatsminer M50S+?
The Whatsminer M50S+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) vs Whatsminer M50S+: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer T19 (88Th) runs at 38.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50S+ runs at 23.7 J/TH — a difference of 14.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 38% better efficacité (38.0 vs 23.7 J/TH).