Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Auradine Teraflux AT2880 | Specification | Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T |
|---|---|---|
| 260.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 25.0 TH/s |
| 4,420 W | Consommation électrique | 2,050 W |
| 17.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 82.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 9,000.0 kg |
| 15,081 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,995 BTU/hr |
| — | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Auradine | Manufacturer | Innosilicon |
Profitability Comparison
Auradine Teraflux AT2880
Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T
Based on BTC price of $78,167 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Auradine Teraflux AT2880 l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 940% more hashrate (260.0 vs 25.0 TH/s). That said, the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 and Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 940% more hashrate (260.0 vs 25.0 TH/s)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T 54% better power draw (4,420 vs 2,050 W)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 79% better efficacité (17.0 vs 82.0 J/TH)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 116% more heat output (15,081 vs 6,995 BTU/hr)
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25TScore: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Auradine Teraflux AT288017.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 is more profitable at $-1.26/day compared to $-4.02/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Auradine Teraflux AT2880 or Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T?
The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T: which fits a residential setup better?
The Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Auradine Teraflux AT2880). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Auradine Teraflux AT2880 and Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T?
The Auradine Teraflux AT2880 runs at 17.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T runs at 82.0 J/TH — a difference of 65.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 79% better efficacité (17.0 vs 82.0 J/TH).
Compare Auradine Teraflux AT2880 with...
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Auradine Teraflux AH3880
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Auradine Teraflux AI3680
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Aisen A1 Pro
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer Loki Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer Pivotal Edition (S9)
- Auradine Teraflux AT2880 vs Antminer S17
Compare Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T with...
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T vs Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
- Innosilicon T2 Turbo 25T vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator