Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T

Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T

Taux de hachage 215.0 TH/s Puissance 3,612 W Efficiency 16.8 J/TH
VS
MicroBT Whatsminer M21

MicroBT Whatsminer M21

Taux de hachage 31.0 TH/s Puissance 1,860 W Efficiency 60.0 J/TH

Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T vs MicroBT Whatsminer M21

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T Specification MicroBT Whatsminer M21
215.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 31.0 TH/s
3,612 W Consommation électrique 1,860 W
16.8 J/TH Efficiency 60.0 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit
14.9 kg Weight 7,150.0 kg
12,324 BTU/hr BTU Output 6,346 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Canaan Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T

Daily Revenue 0.00009894 BTC $7.73
Daily Electricity -$8.67
Daily Profit -$0.93
Monthly -$28.01
Yearly -$340.84

MicroBT Whatsminer M21

Daily Revenue 0.00001427 BTC $1.12
Daily Electricity -$4.46
Daily Profit -$3.35
Monthly -$100.46
Yearly -$1,222.28

Based on BTC price of $78,179 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 594% more hashrate (215.0 vs 31.0 TH/s). The MicroBT Whatsminer M21 claws back ground on consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T and MicroBT Whatsminer M21 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 594% more hashrate (215.0 vs 31.0 TH/s)
  • MicroBT Whatsminer M21 49% better power draw (3,612 vs 1,860 W)
  • Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 72% better efficacité (16.8 vs 60.0 J/TH)
  • Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 100% better weight (14.9 vs 7,150.0 kg)
  • Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 94% more heat output (12,324 vs 6,346 BTU/hr)
  • Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T 7% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 28.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T

Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T

16.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T or the MicroBT Whatsminer M21?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T is more profitable at $-0.93/day compared to $-3.35/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M21. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T or the MicroBT Whatsminer M21 better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M21 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T or MicroBT Whatsminer M21?

The Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M21). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T and MicroBT Whatsminer M21 on J/TH?

The Canaan Avalon A15Pro-215T runs at 16.8 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M21 runs at 60.0 J/TH — a difference of 43.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 72% better efficacité (16.8 vs 60.0 J/TH).