Canaan AvalonMiner 841 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M20S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Canaan AvalonMiner 841 | Specification | MicroBT Whatsminer M20S |
|---|---|---|
| 13.6 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 68.0 TH/s |
| 1,290 W | Consommation électrique | 3,360 W |
| 94.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 49.4 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 4,700.0 kg | Weight | 12,500.0 kg |
| 4,402 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,464 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Canaan | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Canaan AvalonMiner 841
MicroBT Whatsminer M20S
Based on BTC price of $78,190 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 400% more hashrate (13.6 vs 68.0 TH/s) in the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S's favour. The Canaan AvalonMiner 841 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Canaan AvalonMiner 841 and MicroBT Whatsminer M20S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- MicroBT Whatsminer M20S 400% more hashrate (13.6 vs 68.0 TH/s)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 841 62% better power draw (1,290 vs 3,360 W)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M20S 48% better efficacité (94.9 vs 49.4 J/TH)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 841 62% better weight (4,700 vs 12,500 kg)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M20S 160% more heat output (4,402 vs 11,464 BTU/hr)
- Canaan AvalonMiner 841 41% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Canaan AvalonMiner 841 | Metric | MicroBT Whatsminer M20S |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $66 |
| -$2.61 | Daily net profit | -$5.62 |
| -$951 | Net after 1 year | -$2,116 |
| -$1,903 | Net after 2 years | -$4,167 |
| -$2,854 | Net after 3 years | -$6,217 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Canaan AvalonMiner 841Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT Whatsminer M20S49.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Canaan AvalonMiner 841 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M20S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Canaan AvalonMiner 841 is more profitable at $-2.61/day compared to $-5.62/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Canaan AvalonMiner 841 vs MicroBT Whatsminer M20S: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Canaan AvalonMiner 841 or the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S?
The Canaan AvalonMiner 841 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Canaan AvalonMiner 841 and MicroBT Whatsminer M20S?
The Canaan AvalonMiner 841 runs at 94.9 J/TH while the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S runs at 49.4 J/TH — a difference of 45.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 48% better efficacité (94.9 vs 49.4 J/TH).
