Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Goldshell CK6

Goldshell CK6

Taux de hachage 19.3 TH/s Puissance 3,300 W Efficiency 171.0 J/TH
VS
Todek Toddminer C1 PRO

Todek Toddminer C1 PRO

Taux de hachage 3.0 TH/s Puissance 2,700 W Efficiency 900.0 J/TH

Goldshell CK6 vs Todek Toddminer C1 PRO

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Goldshell CK6 Specification Todek Toddminer C1 PRO
19.3 TH/s Taux de hachage 3.0 TH/s
3,300 W Consommation électrique 2,700 W
171.0 J/TH Efficiency 900.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
8,500.0 kg Weight 12,000.0 kg
11,260 BTU/hr BTU Output 9,212 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Eaglesong Algorithme Eaglesong
Goldshell Manufacturer Todek

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Goldshell CK6

Daily Revenue 0.00000888 BTC $0.69
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$7.23
Monthly -$216.77
Yearly -$2,637.35

Todek Toddminer C1 PRO

Daily Revenue 0.00000138 BTC $0.11
Daily Electricity -$6.48
Daily Profit -$6.37
Monthly -$191.16
Yearly -$2,325.80

Based on BTC price of $78,184 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell CK6, which leads on 2 of 3 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 543% more hashrate (19.3 vs 3.0 TH/s). That said, the Todek Toddminer C1 PRO isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Goldshell CK6 — l'emporte sur 2 des 3 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Goldshell CK6 and Todek Toddminer C1 PRO diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Goldshell CK6 543% more hashrate (19.3 vs 3.0 TH/s)
  • Todek Toddminer C1 PRO 18% better power draw (3,300 vs 2,700 W)
  • Goldshell CK6 81% better efficacité (171 vs 900 J/TH)
  • Goldshell CK6 29% better weight (8,500 vs 12,000 kg)
  • Goldshell CK6 22% more heat output (11,260 vs 9,212 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Goldshell CK6 Metric Todek Toddminer C1 PRO
$799 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$7.23 Daily net profit -$6.37
-$3,436 Net after 1 year -$2,326
-$6,074 Net after 2 years -$4,652
-$8,711 Net after 3 years -$6,977
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Goldshell CK6

171.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Goldshell CK6 or Todek Toddminer C1 PRO more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Todek Toddminer C1 PRO is more profitable at $-6.37/day compared to $-7.23/day for the Goldshell CK6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Goldshell CK6 vs Todek Toddminer C1 PRO: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Goldshell CK6 vs Todek Toddminer C1 PRO: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Goldshell CK6 and Todek Toddminer C1 PRO on J/TH?

The Goldshell CK6 runs at 171.0 J/TH while the Todek Toddminer C1 PRO runs at 900.0 J/TH — a difference of 729.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficacité (171 vs 900 J/TH).