Elphapex DG 1+ vs Elphapex DG Hydro 1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Elphapex DG 1+ | Specification | Elphapex DG Hydro 1 |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 20.0 GH/s |
| 3,920 W | Consommation électrique | 6,200 W |
| 280,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 310,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 18.3 kg | Weight | 25.0 kg |
| 13,375 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 21,154 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Elphapex | Manufacturer | Elphapex |
Profitability Comparison
Elphapex DG 1+
Elphapex DG Hydro 1
Based on BTC price of $78,237 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Elphapex DG 1+ l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 37% better power draw (3,920 vs 6,200 W) in the Elphapex DG 1+'s favour. That said, the Elphapex DG Hydro 1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Elphapex DG 1+ and Elphapex DG Hydro 1 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Elphapex DG Hydro 1 43% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Elphapex DG 1+ 37% better power draw (3,920 vs 6,200 W)
- Elphapex DG 1+ 10% better efficacité (280,000 vs 310,000 J/TH)
- Elphapex DG Hydro 1 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Elphapex DG 1+ 27% better weight (18.3 vs 25.0 kg)
- Elphapex DG Hydro 1 58% more heat output (13,375 vs 21,154 BTU/hr)
- Elphapex DG Hydro 1 47% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Elphapex DG 1+ | Metric | Elphapex DG Hydro 1 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,452 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,459 |
| -$9.41 | Daily net profit | -$14.88 |
| -$4,885 | Net after 1 year | -$9,890 |
| -$8,319 | Net after 2 years | -$15,321 |
| -$11,753 | Net after 3 years | -$20,752 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Elphapex DG Hydro 1Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Elphapex DG 1+280,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Elphapex DG 1+ or Elphapex DG Hydro 1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Elphapex DG 1+ is more profitable at $-9.41/day compared to $-14.88/day for the Elphapex DG Hydro 1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Elphapex DG 1+ or the Elphapex DG Hydro 1 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Elphapex DG Hydro 1 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Elphapex DG 1+ at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Elphapex DG 1+ or the Elphapex DG Hydro 1?
The Elphapex DG Hydro 1 scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Elphapex DG 1+). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Elphapex DG 1+ and Elphapex DG Hydro 1?
The Elphapex DG 1+ runs at 280,000.0 J/TH while the Elphapex DG Hydro 1 runs at 310,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 30,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 10% better efficacité (280,000 vs 310,000 J/TH).
