Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Elphapex DG 2

Elphapex DG 2

Taux de hachage 20.0 GH/s Puissance 3,800 W Efficiency 190,000.0 J/TH
VS
Elphapex DG1+

Elphapex DG1+

Taux de hachage 14,400.0 MH/s Puissance 3,920 W Efficiency 272,222.2 J/TH

Elphapex DG 2 vs Elphapex DG1+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Elphapex DG 2 Specification Elphapex DG1+
20.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 14,400.0 MH/s
3,800 W Consommation électrique 3,920 W
190,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 272,222.2 J/TH
75 dB Niveau de bruit 75 dB
18.3 kg Weight 18.3 kg
12,966 BTU/hr BTU Output 13,375 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
Scrypt Algorithme Scrypt
Elphapex Manufacturer Elphapex

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Elphapex DG 2

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$9.12
Daily Profit -$9.12
Monthly -$273.58
Yearly -$3,328.54

Elphapex DG1+

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$9.41
Daily Profit -$9.41
Monthly -$282.22
Yearly -$3,433.73

Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Elphapex DG 2 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 30% better efficacité (190,000 vs 272,222 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Elphapex DG 2 — l'emporte sur 4 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Elphapex DG 2 and Elphapex DG1+ sit on each measurable spec:

  • Elphapex DG 2 39% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Elphapex DG 2 3% better power draw (3,800 vs 3,920 W)
  • Elphapex DG 2 30% better efficacité (190,000 vs 272,222 J/TH)
  • Elphapex DG1+ 3% more heat output (12,966 vs 13,375 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Elphapex DG 2 Metric Elphapex DG1+
$4,680 Upfront cost (MSRP) $8,500
-$9.12 Daily net profit -$9.41
-$8,009 Net after 1 year -$11,934
-$11,337 Net after 2 years -$15,367
-$14,666 Net after 3 years -$18,801
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Elphapex DG 2

190,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Elphapex DG 2 or Elphapex DG1+ more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Elphapex DG 2 is more profitable at $-9.12/day compared to $-9.41/day for the Elphapex DG1+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Elphapex DG 2 vs Elphapex DG1+: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Elphapex DG 2 or Elphapex DG1+?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Elphapex DG 2 and Elphapex DG1+?

The Elphapex DG 2 runs at 190,000.0 J/TH while the Elphapex DG1+ runs at 272,222.2 J/TH — a difference of 82,222.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 30% better efficacité (190,000 vs 272,222 J/TH).