iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 vs Jasminer X16-P
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 | Specification | Jasminer X16-P |
|---|---|---|
| 260.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.8 GH/s |
| 220 W | Consommation électrique | 1,900 W |
| 846,153.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 327,586.2 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.1 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 751 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,483 BTU/hr |
| 66/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260
Jasminer X16-P
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Jasminer X16-P, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 2131% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 and Jasminer X16-P actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Jasminer X16-P 2131% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 88% better power draw (220 vs 1,900 W)
- Jasminer X16-P 61% better efficacité (846,154 vs 327,586 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 85% better weight (2.1 vs 14.0 kg)
- Jasminer X16-P 764% more heat output (751 vs 6,483 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 136% more score de minage domestique (66.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 | Metric | Jasminer X16-P |
|---|---|---|
| $650 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,550 |
| -$0.53 | Daily net profit | -$4.56 |
| -$843 | Net after 1 year | -$4,214 |
| -$1,035 | Net after 2 years | -$5,879 |
| -$1,228 | Net after 3 years | -$7,543 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-P327,586.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 or Jasminer X16-P more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 is more profitable at $-0.53/day compared to $-4.56/day for the Jasminer X16-P. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 vs Jasminer X16-P: which runs at a lower noise level?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Jasminer X16-P at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 or the Jasminer X16-P?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Jasminer X16-P). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 vs Jasminer X16-P: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 runs at 846,153.9 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-P runs at 327,586.2 J/TH — a difference of 518,567.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 61% better efficacité (846,154 vs 327,586 J/TH).