iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 vs Jasminer X16-P
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 | Specification | Jasminer X16-P |
|---|---|---|
| 330.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.8 GH/s |
| 240 W | Consommation électrique | 1,900 W |
| 727,272.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 327,586.2 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.4 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 819 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,483 BTU/hr |
| 66/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330
Jasminer X16-P
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Jasminer X16-P edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 1658% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 and Jasminer X16-P diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Jasminer X16-P 1658% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 87% better power draw (240 vs 1,900 W)
- Jasminer X16-P 55% better efficacité (727,273 vs 327,586 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 83% better weight (2.4 vs 14.0 kg)
- Jasminer X16-P 692% more heat output (819 vs 6,483 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 136% more score de minage domestique (66.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 | Metric | Jasminer X16-P |
|---|---|---|
| $899 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,550 |
| -$0.58 | Daily net profit | -$4.56 |
| -$1,109 | Net after 1 year | -$4,214 |
| -$1,319 | Net after 2 years | -$5,879 |
| -$1,530 | Net after 3 years | -$7,543 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-P327,586.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 or the Jasminer X16-P?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-4.56/day for the Jasminer X16-P. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 or Jasminer X16-P?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Jasminer X16-P at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 or the Jasminer X16-P?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Jasminer X16-P). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 and Jasminer X16-P?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 runs at 727,272.7 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-P runs at 327,586.2 J/TH — a difference of 399,686.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 55% better efficacité (727,273 vs 327,586 J/TH).