Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Innosilicon A4 Dominator

Innosilicon A4 Dominator

Taux de hachage 280.0 MH/s Puissance 1,050 W Efficiency 3,750,000.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

Taux de hachage 32.5 GH/s Puissance 750 W Efficiency 23,076.9 J/TH

Innosilicon A4 Dominator vs Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A4 Dominator Specification Innosilicon A5 DashMaster
280.0 MH/s Taux de hachage 32.5 GH/s
1,050 W Consommation électrique 750 W
3,750,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 23,076.9 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
9,200.0 kg Weight 3,100.0 kg
3,583 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,559 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
Scrypt Algorithme X11
Innosilicon Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A4 Dominator

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.52
Daily Profit -$2.52
Monthly -$75.60
Yearly -$919.80

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.80
Daily Profit -$1.80
Monthly -$53.96
Yearly -$656.57

Based on BTC price of $78,233 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Where it pulls away hardest is 99% better efficacité (3,750,000 vs 23,077 J/TH). The Innosilicon A4 Dominator claws back ground on score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Innosilicon A5 DashMaster — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A4 Dominator and Innosilicon A5 DashMaster sit on each measurable spec:

  • Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 11507% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 29% better power draw (1,050 vs 750 W)
  • Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 99% better efficacité (3,750,000 vs 23,077 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 66% better weight (9,200 vs 3,100 kg)
  • Innosilicon A4 Dominator 40% more heat output (3,583 vs 2,559 BTU/hr)
  • Innosilicon A4 Dominator 3% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 30.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon A4 Dominator

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

23,076.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Innosilicon A4 Dominator or the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster is more profitable at $-1.80/day compared to $-2.52/day for the Innosilicon A4 Dominator. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Innosilicon A4 Dominator or the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Innosilicon A4 Dominator vs Innosilicon A5 DashMaster: which fits a residential setup better?

The Innosilicon A4 Dominator scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Innosilicon A4 Dominator vs Innosilicon A5 DashMaster: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Innosilicon A4 Dominator runs at 3,750,000.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster runs at 23,076.9 J/TH — a difference of 3,726,923.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (3,750,000 vs 23,077 J/TH).