Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 720.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.2 TH/s |
| 1,300 W | Consommation électrique | 500 W |
| 1,805,555.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 119.1 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 15.5 kg | Weight | 4.0 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AE2 720Mh
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite, which leads on 6 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficacité (1,805,556 vs 119 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh and Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 583233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 4.2 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 62% better power draw (1,300 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 100% better efficacité (1,805,556 vs 119 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 17% better noise (60.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 74% better weight (15.5 vs 4.0 kg)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 160% more heat output (4,436 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 19% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $1,595 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$1.05 |
| -$2,734 | Net after 1 year | -$1,082 |
| -$3,873 | Net after 2 years | -$1,465 |
| -$5,011 | Net after 3 years | -$1,848 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS7 LiteScore: 62/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite119.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is more profitable at $-1.05/day compared to $-3.12/day for the Iceriver AE2 720Mh. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Iceriver AE2 720Mh at 60 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 52/100 for the Iceriver AE2 720Mh). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver AE2 720Mh and Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh runs at 1,805,555.6 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite runs at 119.1 J/TH — a difference of 1,805,436.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,805,556 vs 119 J/TH).