Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 4.2 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 500 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 119.1 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 4.0 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 86% better power draw (3,500 vs 500 W) in the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite's favour. The Iceriver AL3 claws back ground on hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver AL3 and Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver AL3 257% more hashrate (15.0 vs 4.2 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 86% better power draw (3,500 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 49% better efficacité (233 vs 119 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 75% better weight (16.0 vs 4.0 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 600% more heat output (11,942 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 72% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$1.05 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$1,082 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$1,465 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$1,848 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS7 LiteScore: 62/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite119.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver AL3 or the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is more profitable at $-1.05/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Iceriver AL3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver AL3 or the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver AL3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite runs at 119.1 J/TH — a difference of 114.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 49% better efficacité (233 vs 119 J/TH).