Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Iceriver AL3 is the stronger pick — it leads on 4 of 4 head-to-head factors. The Iceriver AL3 runs 15.0 TH/s; the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) runs 2.0 GH/s.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 GH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,580 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,790,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,215 BTU/hr |
| 8/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Zksnark |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Based on BTC price of $65,268 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver AL3, which leads on 4 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (233 vs 1,790,000 J/TH) in the Iceriver AL3's favour. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver AL3 and Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver AL3 749900% more hashrate (15.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver AL3 2% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,580 W)
- Iceriver AL3 100% better efficacité (233 vs 1,790,000 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 6% better weight (16.0 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 2% more heat output (11,942 vs 12,215 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,390 |
| -$7.91 | Daily net profit | -$8.59 |
| -$4,436 | Net after 1 year | -$8,526 |
| -$7,322 | Net after 2 years | -$11,662 |
| -$10,209 | Net after 3 years | -$14,798 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Is the Iceriver AL3 or Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver AL3 is more profitable at $-7.91/day compared to $-8.59/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver AL3 or the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s): which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) runs at 1,790,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,789,766.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (233 vs 1,790,000 J/TH).