Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver ALPH AL0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | Iceriver ALPH AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 400.0 GH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
Iceriver ALPH AL0
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver AL3, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 3650% more hashrate (15.0 vs 0.4 TH/s). The Iceriver ALPH AL0 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver AL3 and Iceriver ALPH AL0 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver AL3 3650% more hashrate (15.0 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 97% better power draw (3,500 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver AL3 7% better efficacité (233 vs 250 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 84% better weight (16.0 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 3400% more heat output (11,942 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 78% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | Iceriver ALPH AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $178 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$260 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$343 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$425 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALPH AL0Score: 64/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver AL3 or the Iceriver ALPH AL0?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver ALPH AL0 is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver AL3 vs Iceriver ALPH AL0: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver ALPH AL0 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Iceriver AL3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver AL3 or the Iceriver ALPH AL0?
The Iceriver ALPH AL0 scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver AL3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver AL3 and Iceriver ALPH AL0 on J/TH?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the Iceriver ALPH AL0 runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 16.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficacité (233 vs 250 J/TH).