Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs IceRiver AL0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Specification | IceRiver AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 400.0 MH/s |
| 3,580 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 1,790,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 250,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 10 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 12,215 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
IceRiver AL0
Based on BTC price of $78,158 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the IceRiver AL0 comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 97% better power draw (3,580 vs 100 W). The Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) claws back ground on hashrate. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) and IceRiver AL0 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 400% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver AL0 97% better power draw (3,580 vs 100 W)
- IceRiver AL0 86% better efficacité (1,790,000 vs 250,000 J/TH)
- IceRiver AL0 87% better noise (75.0 vs 10.0 dB)
- IceRiver AL0 83% better weight (15.0 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 3480% more heat output (12,215 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver AL0 137% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Metric | IceRiver AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,390 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$8.59 | Daily net profit | -$0.24 |
| -$8,526 | Net after 1 year | -$287 |
| -$11,662 | Net after 2 years | -$374 |
| -$14,798 | Net after 3 years | -$462 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver AL0Score: 71/100. 10 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver AL0250,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or IceRiver AL0 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver AL0 is more profitable at $-0.24/day compared to $-8.59/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or IceRiver AL0?
The IceRiver AL0 is quieter at 10 dB compared to the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs IceRiver AL0: which fits a residential setup better?
The IceRiver AL0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs IceRiver AL0: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) runs at 1,790,000.0 J/TH while the IceRiver AL0 runs at 250,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,540,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficacité (1,790,000 vs 250,000 J/TH).