Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus vs Iceriver ALPH AL0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus | Specification | Iceriver ALPH AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 400.0 GH/s |
| 480 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 480.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 1,638 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 34/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus
Iceriver ALPH AL0
Based on BTC price of $78,236 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver ALPH AL0 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 79% better power draw (480 vs 100 W). The Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus and Iceriver ALPH AL0 sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 150% more hashrate (1.0 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 79% better power draw (480 vs 100 W)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 48% better efficacité (480 vs 250 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 12% better weight (2.2 vs 2.5 kg)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 380% more heat output (1,638 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALPH AL0 88% more score de minage domestique (34.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus | Metric | Iceriver ALPH AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| $129 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $178 |
| -$1.12 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$536 | Net after 1 year | -$260 |
| -$944 | Net after 2 years | -$343 |
| -$1,351 | Net after 3 years | -$425 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALPH AL0Score: 64/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver ALPH AL0250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus vs Iceriver ALPH AL0: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver ALPH AL0 is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-1.12/day for the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus or Iceriver ALPH AL0?
The Iceriver ALPH AL0 is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus or Iceriver ALPH AL0?
The Iceriver ALPH AL0 scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus and Iceriver ALPH AL0?
The Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus runs at 480.0 J/TH while the Iceriver ALPH AL0 runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 230.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 48% better efficacité (480 vs 250 J/TH).