Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus vs IceRiver AL0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus | Specification | IceRiver AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 400.0 MH/s |
| 480 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 480.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 250,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 10 dB |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 1,638 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 34/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus
IceRiver AL0
Based on BTC price of $78,163 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 249900% more hashrate (1.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus's favour. The IceRiver AL0 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus and IceRiver AL0 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 249900% more hashrate (1.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver AL0 79% better power draw (480 vs 100 W)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 100% better efficacité (480 vs 250,000 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 12% better weight (2.2 vs 2.5 kg)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 380% more heat output (1,638 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver AL0 109% more score de minage domestique (34.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus | Metric | IceRiver AL0 |
|---|---|---|
| $129 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$1.12 | Daily net profit | -$0.24 |
| -$536 | Net after 1 year | -$287 |
| -$944 | Net after 2 years | -$374 |
| -$1,351 | Net after 3 years | -$462 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver AL0Score: 71/100. 10 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus480.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus or the IceRiver AL0?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver AL0 is more profitable at $-0.24/day compared to $-1.12/day for the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus or the IceRiver AL0 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver AL0 is quieter at 10 dB compared to the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus or the IceRiver AL0?
The IceRiver AL0 scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus and IceRiver AL0 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus runs at 480.0 J/TH while the IceRiver AL0 runs at 250,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 249,520.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (480 vs 250,000 J/TH).