Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus vs Dragonball Miner A40
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus | Specification | Dragonball Miner A40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.3 TH/s |
| 480 W | Consommation électrique | 1,600 W |
| 480.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 484.9 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 1,638 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,459 BTU/hr |
| 34/100 | Home Mining Score | 42/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus
Dragonball Miner A40
Based on BTC price of $78,244 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 70% better power draw (480 vs 1,600 W). That said, the Dragonball Miner A40 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus and Dragonball Miner A40 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Dragonball Miner A40 230% more hashrate (1.0 vs 3.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 70% better power draw (480 vs 1,600 W)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 1% better efficacité (480 vs 485 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus 85% better weight (2.2 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball Miner A40 233% more heat output (1,638 vs 5,459 BTU/hr)
- Dragonball Miner A40 24% more score de minage domestique (34.0 vs 42.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus | Metric | Dragonball Miner A40 |
|---|---|---|
| $129 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,400 |
| -$1.12 | Daily net profit | -$3.72 |
| -$536 | Net after 1 year | -$4,758 |
| -$944 | Net after 2 years | -$6,116 |
| -$1,351 | Net after 3 years | -$7,475 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Dragonball Miner A40Score: 42/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus480.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus or the Dragonball Miner A40?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus is more profitable at $-1.12/day compared to $-3.72/day for the Dragonball Miner A40. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus or Dragonball Miner A40?
The Dragonball Miner A40 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus vs Dragonball Miner A40: which fits a residential setup better?
The Dragonball Miner A40 scores 42/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 34/100 for the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus and Dragonball Miner A40 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AL-BOX II Plus runs at 480.0 J/TH while the Dragonball Miner A40 runs at 484.9 J/TH — a difference of 4.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 1% better efficacité (480 vs 485 J/TH).