Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro vs Dragonball Miner A40
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro | Specification | Dragonball Miner A40 |
|---|---|---|
| 16.6 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.3 TH/s |
| 3,730 W | Consommation électrique | 1,600 W |
| 224.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 484.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 13.6 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 12,727 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,459 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 42/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro
Dragonball Miner A40
Based on BTC price of $78,236 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 403% more hashrate (16.6 vs 3.3 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro's favour. That said, the Dragonball Miner A40 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro and Dragonball Miner A40 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 403% more hashrate (16.6 vs 3.3 TH/s)
- Dragonball Miner A40 57% better power draw (3,730 vs 1,600 W)
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 54% better efficacité (225 vs 485 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 6% better weight (13.6 vs 14.5 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 133% more heat output (12,727 vs 5,459 BTU/hr)
- Dragonball Miner A40 40% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 42.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro | Metric | Dragonball Miner A40 |
|---|---|---|
| $9,100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,400 |
| -$8.35 | Daily net profit | -$3.72 |
| -$12,149 | Net after 1 year | -$4,758 |
| -$15,199 | Net after 2 years | -$6,116 |
| -$18,248 | Net after 3 years | -$7,475 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Dragonball Miner A40Score: 42/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro224.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro vs Dragonball Miner A40: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Dragonball Miner A40 is more profitable at $-3.72/day compared to $-8.35/day for the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro or Dragonball Miner A40?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro vs Dragonball Miner A40: which fits a residential setup better?
The Dragonball Miner A40 scores 42/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro and Dragonball Miner A40 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro runs at 224.7 J/TH while the Dragonball Miner A40 runs at 484.9 J/TH — a difference of 260.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 54% better efficacité (225 vs 485 J/TH).