Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro vs Antminer D7
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro | Specification | Antminer D7 |
|---|---|---|
| 16.6 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1,286.0 GH/s |
| 3,730 W | Consommation électrique | 3,148 W |
| 224.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 2,447.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 70 dB |
| 13.6 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 12,727 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,741 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | X11 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro
Antminer D7
Based on BTC price of $78,162 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro, which leads on 3 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 1191% more hashrate (16.6 vs 1.3 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro's favour. That said, the Antminer D7 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro and Antminer D7 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 1191% more hashrate (16.6 vs 1.3 TH/s)
- Antminer D7 16% better power draw (3,730 vs 3,148 W)
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 91% better efficacité (225 vs 2,448 J/TH)
- Antminer D7 7% better noise (75.0 vs 70.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 6% better weight (13.6 vs 14.4 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 18% more heat output (12,727 vs 10,741 BTU/hr)
- Antminer D7 20% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro | Metric | Antminer D7 |
|---|---|---|
| $9,100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,500 |
| -$8.35 | Daily net profit | -$7.51 |
| -$12,150 | Net after 1 year | -$5,241 |
| -$15,199 | Net after 2 years | -$7,982 |
| -$18,249 | Net after 3 years | -$10,722 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer D7Score: 36/100. 70 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro224.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro or the Antminer D7?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer D7 is more profitable at $-7.51/day compared to $-8.35/day for the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro or the Antminer D7 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Antminer D7 is quieter at 70 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro or Antminer D7?
The Antminer D7 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro and Antminer D7?
The Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro runs at 224.7 J/TH while the Antminer D7 runs at 2,447.9 J/TH — a difference of 2,223.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 91% better efficacité (225 vs 2,448 J/TH).