Goldshell AL BOX III vs Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL BOX III | Specification | Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 600 W | Consommation électrique | 500 W |
| 480.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 250.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 5.0 kg |
| 2,047 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL BOX III
Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE
Based on BTC price of $78,236 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE l'emporte sur 5 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 48% better efficacité (480 vs 250 J/TH) in the Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE's favour. The Goldshell AL BOX III claws back ground on rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AL BOX III and Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE 60% more hashrate (1.3 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE 17% better power draw (600 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE 48% better efficacité (480 vs 250 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 56% better weight (2.2 vs 5.0 kg)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 20% more heat output (2,047 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE 107% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AL BOX III | Metric | Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE |
|---|---|---|
| $139 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $538 |
| -$1.39 | Daily net profit | -$1.13 |
| -$648 | Net after 1 year | -$950 |
| -$1,157 | Net after 2 years | -$1,361 |
| -$1,667 | Net after 3 years | -$1,773 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITEScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AL BOX III vs Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE is more profitable at $-1.13/day compared to $-1.39/day for the Goldshell AL BOX III. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AL BOX III vs Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX III at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AL BOX III or Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE?
The Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX III). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AL BOX III and Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE?
The Goldshell AL BOX III runs at 480.0 J/TH while the Iceriver ALPH AL2 LITE runs at 250.0 J/TH — a difference of 230.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 48% better efficacité (480 vs 250 J/TH).