Goldshell AL BOX III vs Dragonball Miner A40
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL BOX III | Specification | Dragonball Miner A40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.3 TH/s |
| 600 W | Consommation électrique | 1,600 W |
| 480.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 484.9 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 2,047 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,459 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 42/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL BOX III
Dragonball Miner A40
Based on BTC price of $78,185 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell AL BOX III edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 63% better power draw (600 vs 1,600 W). The Dragonball Miner A40 claws back ground on hashrate and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AL BOX III and Dragonball Miner A40 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Dragonball Miner A40 164% more hashrate (1.3 vs 3.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 63% better power draw (600 vs 1,600 W)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 1% better efficacité (480 vs 485 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 85% better weight (2.2 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball Miner A40 167% more heat output (2,047 vs 5,459 BTU/hr)
- Dragonball Miner A40 40% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 42.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AL BOX III | Metric | Dragonball Miner A40 |
|---|---|---|
| $139 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,400 |
| -$1.40 | Daily net profit | -$3.72 |
| -$648 | Net after 1 year | -$4,758 |
| -$1,157 | Net after 2 years | -$6,117 |
| -$1,667 | Net after 3 years | -$7,475 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Dragonball Miner A40Score: 42/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL BOX III480.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AL BOX III vs Dragonball Miner A40: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL BOX III is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-3.72/day for the Dragonball Miner A40. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AL BOX III or the Dragonball Miner A40 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Dragonball Miner A40 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX III at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AL BOX III or Dragonball Miner A40?
The Dragonball Miner A40 scores 42/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX III). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AL BOX III and Dragonball Miner A40?
The Goldshell AL BOX III runs at 480.0 J/TH while the Dragonball Miner A40 runs at 484.9 J/TH — a difference of 4.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 1% better efficacité (480 vs 485 J/TH).