Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh vs IceRiver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh | Specification | IceRiver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 2,000,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 64/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh
IceRiver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the IceRiver KS3M edges it: 3 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 11999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s). The Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh and IceRiver KS3M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- IceRiver KS3M 11999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh 97% better power draw (100 vs 3,400 W)
- IceRiver KS3M 100% better efficacité (2,000,000 vs 567 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh 33% better noise (50.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh 83% better weight (2.5 vs 14.4 kg)
- IceRiver KS3M 3300% more heat output (341 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh 78% more score de minage domestique (64.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh | Metric | IceRiver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $280 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $8,500 |
| -$0.24 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$368 | Net after 1 year | -$11,400 |
| -$455 | Net after 2 years | -$14,299 |
| -$543 | Net after 3 years | -$17,199 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALEO AE0 50MhScore: 64/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
IceRiver KS3M566.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh or IceRiver KS3M more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh is more profitable at $-0.24/day compared to $-7.94/day for the IceRiver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh or IceRiver KS3M?
The Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh is quieter at 50 dB compared to the IceRiver KS3M at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh vs IceRiver KS3M: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the IceRiver KS3M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh and IceRiver KS3M on J/TH?
The Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh runs at 2,000,000.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 1,999,433.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (2,000,000 vs 567 J/TH).