Iceriver AL3 vs IceRiver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | IceRiver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
IceRiver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver AL3, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 150% more hashrate (15.0 vs 6.0 TH/s). The IceRiver KS3M holds the edge in consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver AL3 and IceRiver KS3M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver AL3 150% more hashrate (15.0 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS3M 3% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,400 W)
- Iceriver AL3 59% better efficacité (233 vs 567 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3M 10% better weight (16.0 vs 14.4 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 3% more heat output (11,942 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | IceRiver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $8,500 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$11,400 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$14,299 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$17,199 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver AL3 vs IceRiver KS3M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver AL3 is more profitable at $-7.86/day compared to $-7.94/day for the IceRiver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver AL3 vs IceRiver KS3M: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver AL3 or the IceRiver KS3M?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
What is the efficiency difference between Iceriver AL3 and IceRiver KS3M?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 333.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 59% better efficacité (233 vs 567 J/TH).