Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs Iceriver KS0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Specification | Iceriver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| 300.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 100.0 GH/s |
| 500 W | Consommation électrique | 65 W |
| 1,666,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 4.0 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite
Iceriver KS0
Based on BTC price of $78,252 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KS0 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 650 J/TH). The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite claws back ground on score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite and Iceriver KS0 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KS0 33233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS0 87% better power draw (500.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Iceriver KS0 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 650 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS0 38% better weight (4.0 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 669% more heat output (1,706 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite 72% more score de minage domestique (62.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite | Metric | Iceriver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| $979 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$1.20 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$1,417 | Net after 1 year | -$56 |
| -$1,855 | Net after 2 years | -$111 |
| -$2,293 | Net after 3 years | -$167 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALEO AE1 LiteScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS0650.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs Iceriver KS0: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-1.20/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite or the Iceriver KS0 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Iceriver KS0 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite vs Iceriver KS0: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS0). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite and Iceriver KS0 on J/TH?
The Iceriver ALEO AE1 Lite runs at 1,666,666.7 J/TH while the Iceriver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,666,016.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,666,667 vs 650 J/TH).