Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs Iceriver KS0
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Specification | Iceriver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 100.0 GH/s |
| 3,580 W | Consommation électrique | 65 W |
| 1,790,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 650.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 12,215 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 222 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Iceriver KS0
Based on BTC price of $78,252 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KS0 comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (1,790,000 vs 650 J/TH) in the Iceriver KS0's favour. That said, the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) and Iceriver KS0 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KS0 4900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.1 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS0 98% better power draw (3,580.0 vs 65.0 W)
- Iceriver KS0 100% better efficacité (1,790,000 vs 650 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS0 83% better weight (15.0 vs 2.5 kg)
- Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) 5407% more heat output (12,215 vs 222 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS0 20% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) | Metric | Iceriver KS0 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,390 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$8.59 | Daily net profit | -$0.15 |
| -$8,526 | Net after 1 year | -$56 |
| -$11,662 | Net after 2 years | -$111 |
| -$14,798 | Net after 3 years | -$167 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS0Score: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS0650.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs Iceriver KS0: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS0 is more profitable at $-0.15/day compared to $-8.59/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) or Iceriver KS0?
The Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Iceriver KS0 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs Iceriver KS0: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KS0 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) vs Iceriver KS0: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) runs at 1,790,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS0 runs at 650.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,789,350.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,790,000 vs 650 J/TH).