Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) vs Todek Toddminer C1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) | Specification | Todek Toddminer C1 |
|---|---|---|
| 58.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.6 TH/s |
| 2,813 W | Consommation électrique | 1,380 W |
| 48.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 890.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 4,600.0 kg |
| 9,598 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,709 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Todek |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th)
Todek Toddminer C1
Based on BTC price of $77,900 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 3642% more hashrate (58.0 vs 1.6 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th)'s favour. The Todek Toddminer C1 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) and Todek Toddminer C1 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) 3642% more hashrate (58.0 vs 1.6 TH/s)
- Todek Toddminer C1 51% better power draw (2,813 vs 1,380 W)
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) 95% better efficacité (48.5 vs 890.3 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) 100% better weight (16.1 vs 4,600.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) 104% more heat output (9,598 vs 4,709 BTU/hr)
- Todek Toddminer C1 41% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) | Metric | Todek Toddminer C1 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,860 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$4.67 | Daily net profit | -$3.26 |
| -$3,565 | Net after 1 year | -$1,189 |
| -$5,271 | Net after 2 years | -$2,377 |
| -$6,976 | Net after 3 years | -$3,566 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Todek Toddminer C1Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th)48.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) vs Todek Toddminer C1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Todek Toddminer C1 is more profitable at $-3.26/day compared to $-4.67/day for the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) or Todek Toddminer C1?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) or Todek Toddminer C1?
The Todek Toddminer C1 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) and Todek Toddminer C1?
The Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) runs at 48.5 J/TH while the Todek Toddminer C1 runs at 890.3 J/TH — a difference of 841.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 95% better efficacité (48.5 vs 890.3 J/TH).