Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) vs SuperScalar K10
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) | Specification | SuperScalar K10 |
|---|---|---|
| 8.3 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 45.0 GH/s |
| 3,188 W | Consommation électrique | 1,845 W |
| 384.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 41,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 8.3 kg |
| 10,878 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,295 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | SuperScalar |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)
SuperScalar K10
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th), which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 18344% more hashrate (8.3 vs 0.0 TH/s). The SuperScalar K10 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) and SuperScalar K10 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) 18344% more hashrate (8.3 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- SuperScalar K10 42% better power draw (3,188 vs 1,845 W)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) 99% better efficacité (384 vs 41,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) 73% more heat output (10,878 vs 6,295 BTU/hr)
- SuperScalar K10 27% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) | Metric | SuperScalar K10 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,850 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,200 |
| -$7.35 | Daily net profit | -$4.43 |
| -$6,534 | Net after 1 year | -$6,816 |
| -$9,217 | Net after 2 years | -$8,431 |
| -$11,901 | Net after 3 years | -$10,047 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
SuperScalar K10Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)384.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) vs SuperScalar K10: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the SuperScalar K10 is more profitable at $-4.43/day compared to $-7.35/day for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) or SuperScalar K10?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) vs SuperScalar K10: which fits a residential setup better?
The SuperScalar K10 scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) and SuperScalar K10?
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) runs at 384.1 J/TH while the SuperScalar K10 runs at 41,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 40,615.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (384 vs 41,000 J/TH).