Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) vs Iceriver KAS KS5M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS5M |
|---|---|---|
| 20.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 15.0 TH/s |
| 3,000 W | Consommation électrique | 3,400 W |
| 150.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 226.7 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.8 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 10,236 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)
Iceriver KAS KS5M
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th), which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). Its biggest concrete edge: 34% better efficacité (150 vs 227 J/TH). The Iceriver KAS KS5M holds the edge in rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) and Iceriver KAS KS5M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) 33% more hashrate (20.0 vs 15.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) 12% better power draw (3,000 vs 3,400 W)
- Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) 34% better efficacité (150 vs 227 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 5% better weight (15.8 vs 15.0 kg)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 13% more heat output (10,236 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS5M |
|---|---|---|
| $799 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $449 |
| -$6.48 | Daily net profit | -$7.62 |
| -$3,164 | Net after 1 year | -$3,230 |
| -$5,530 | Net after 2 years | -$6,012 |
| -$7,895 | Net after 3 years | -$8,793 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th)150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) or the Iceriver KAS KS5M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) is more profitable at $-6.48/day compared to $-7.62/day for the Iceriver KAS KS5M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) or the Iceriver KAS KS5M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) vs Iceriver KAS KS5M: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) vs Iceriver KAS KS5M: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer KS5 (20Th) runs at 150.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS5M runs at 226.7 J/TH — a difference of 76.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 34% better efficacité (150 vs 227 J/TH).