Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro (21Th) vs IceRiver KS0 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro (21Th) | Specification | IceRiver KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 21.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 200.0 GH/s |
| 3,150 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 150.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 500.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 35 dB |
| 15.8 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 10,748 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 71/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro (21Th)
IceRiver KS0 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,236 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro (21Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 10400% more hashrate (21.0 vs 0.2 TH/s). The IceRiver KS0 Pro claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro (21Th) and IceRiver KS0 Pro sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro (21Th) 10400% more hashrate (21.0 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 97% better power draw (3,150 vs 100 W)
- Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro (21Th) 70% better efficacité (150 vs 500 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 53% better noise (75.0 vs 35.0 dB)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 84% better weight (15.8 vs 2.5 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro (21Th) 3050% more heat output (10,748 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS0 Pro 97% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 71.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro (21Th) | Metric | IceRiver KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $860 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $199 |
| -$6.80 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$3,343 | Net after 1 year | -$284 |
| -$5,827 | Net after 2 years | -$369 |
| -$8,310 | Net after 3 years | -$454 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS0 ProScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro (21Th)150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro (21Th) or IceRiver KS0 Pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-6.80/day for the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro (21Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro (21Th) or IceRiver KS0 Pro?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro (21Th) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro (21Th) or the IceRiver KS0 Pro?
The IceRiver KS0 Pro scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro (21Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro (21Th) and IceRiver KS0 Pro on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer KS5 Pro (21Th) runs at 150.0 J/TH while the IceRiver KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 350.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 70% better efficacité (150 vs 500 J/TH).