Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 580.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 9.5 GH/s |
| 942 W | Consommation électrique | 3,425 W |
| 1,624,137.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 360,526.3 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 4,400.0 kg | Weight | 15,000.0 kg |
| 3,214 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,686 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,200 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 1538% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) 1538% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 72% better power draw (942 vs 3,425 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) 78% better efficacité (1,624,138 vs 360,526 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 71% better weight (4,400 vs 15,000 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) 264% more heat output (3,214 vs 11,686 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 41% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,190 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $821 |
| -$2.26 | Daily net profit | -$8.22 |
| -$2,015 | Net after 1 year | -$3,822 |
| -$2,840 | Net after 2 years | -$6,822 |
| -$3,666 | Net after 3 years | -$9,822 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)360,526.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) is more profitable at $-2.26/day compared to $-8.22/day for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh)?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) runs at 1,624,137.9 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer L7 (9.5Gh) runs at 360,526.3 J/TH — a difference of 1,263,611.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 78% better efficacité (1,624,138 vs 360,526 J/TH).