Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Specification | VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 580.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 16.2 GH/s |
| 942 W | Consommation électrique | 3,700 W |
| 1,624,137.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 228,395.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 4,400.0 kg | Weight | 15.6 kg |
| 3,214 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,624 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | VOLCMINER |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 2693% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 2693% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 75% better power draw (942 vs 3,700 W)
- VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 86% better efficacité (1,624,138 vs 228,395 J/TH)
- VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 100% better weight (4,400.0 vs 15.6 kg)
- VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 293% more heat output (3,214 vs 12,624 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 3% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Metric | VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,190 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$2.26 | Daily net profit | -$8.88 |
| -$2,015 | Net after 1 year | -$3,241 |
| -$2,840 | Net after 2 years | -$6,482 |
| -$3,666 | Net after 3 years | -$9,723 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)228,395.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) is more profitable at $-2.26/day compared to $-8.88/day for the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh): which runs at a lower noise level?
The VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) runs at 1,624,137.9 J/TH while the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) runs at 228,395.1 J/TH — a difference of 1,395,742.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficacité (1,624,138 vs 228,395 J/TH).
