VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) vs VOLCMINER D1 Hydro (30.4Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) | Specification | VOLCMINER D1 Hydro (30.4Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 16.2 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 30.4 GH/s |
| 3,700 W | Consommation électrique | 7,600 W |
| 228,395.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 250,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 15.6 kg | Weight | 39.5 kg |
| 12,624 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 25,931 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| VOLCMINER | Manufacturer | VOLCMINER |
Profitability Comparison
VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)
VOLCMINER D1 Hydro (30.4Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,237 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) et le VOLCMINER D1 Hydro (30.4Gh) sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
The VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) and VOLCMINER D1 Hydro (30.4Gh) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- VOLCMINER D1 Hydro (30.4Gh) 88% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 51% better power draw (3,700 vs 7,600 W)
- VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 9% better efficacité (228,395 vs 250,000 J/TH)
- VOLCMINER D1 Hydro (30.4Gh) 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) 61% better weight (15.6 vs 39.5 kg)
- VOLCMINER D1 Hydro (30.4Gh) 105% more heat output (12,624 vs 25,931 BTU/hr)
- VOLCMINER D1 Hydro (30.4Gh) 47% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) | Metric | VOLCMINER D1 Hydro (30.4Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,799 |
| -$8.88 | Daily net profit | -$18.24 |
| -$3,241 | Net after 1 year | -$12,456 |
| -$6,482 | Net after 2 years | -$19,113 |
| -$9,723 | Net after 3 years | -$25,771 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
VOLCMINER D1 Hydro (30.4Gh)Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)228,395.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) vs VOLCMINER D1 Hydro (30.4Gh): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) is more profitable at $-8.88/day compared to $-18.24/day for the VOLCMINER D1 Hydro (30.4Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) or the VOLCMINER D1 Hydro (30.4Gh) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The VOLCMINER D1 Hydro (30.4Gh) is quieter at 50 dB compared to the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) or the VOLCMINER D1 Hydro (30.4Gh)?
The VOLCMINER D1 Hydro (30.4Gh) scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) vs VOLCMINER D1 Hydro (30.4Gh): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The VOLCMINER D1 (16.2Gh) runs at 228,395.1 J/TH while the VOLCMINER D1 Hydro (30.4Gh) runs at 250,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 21,604.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 9% better efficacité (228,395 vs 250,000 J/TH).