Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Goldshell LT5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Specification | Goldshell LT5 |
|---|---|---|
| 580.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.1 GH/s |
| 942 W | Consommation électrique | 2,080 W |
| 1,624,137.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,014,634.2 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 4,400.0 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 3,214 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,097 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)
Goldshell LT5
Based on BTC price of $78,200 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell LT5 comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 253% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) and Goldshell LT5 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell LT5 253% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 55% better power draw (942 vs 2,080 W)
- Goldshell LT5 38% better efficacité (1,624,138 vs 1,014,634 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 48% better weight (4,400 vs 8,500 kg)
- Goldshell LT5 121% more heat output (3,214 vs 7,097 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) 19% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) | Metric | Goldshell LT5 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,190 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $8,364 |
| -$2.26 | Daily net profit | -$4.99 |
| -$2,015 | Net after 1 year | -$10,186 |
| -$2,840 | Net after 2 years | -$12,008 |
| -$3,666 | Net after 3 years | -$13,830 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh)Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell LT51,014,634.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or the Goldshell LT5?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) is more profitable at $-2.26/day compared to $-4.99/day for the Goldshell LT5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) or the Goldshell LT5 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Goldshell LT5: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell LT5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) vs Goldshell LT5: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer L3++ (580Mh) runs at 1,624,137.9 J/TH while the Goldshell LT5 runs at 1,014,634.2 J/TH — a difference of 609,503.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 38% better efficacité (1,624,138 vs 1,014,634 J/TH).