Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell LT5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell LT5 |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.1 GH/s |
| 530 W | Consommation électrique | 2,080 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,014,634.2 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 8,500.0 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,097 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell LT5
Based on BTC price of $78,237 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Goldshell AE-BOX II et le Goldshell LT5 sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell LT5 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell LT5 3696% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 75% better power draw (530 vs 2,080 W)
- Goldshell LT5 90% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 1,014,634 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 100% better weight (3.0 vs 8,500.0 kg)
- Goldshell LT5 292% more heat output (1,808 vs 7,097 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 150% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell LT5 |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $8,364 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$4.99 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$10,186 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$12,008 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$13,830 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell LT51,014,634.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell LT5 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-4.99/day for the Goldshell LT5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell LT5 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell LT5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell LT5?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Goldshell LT5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell LT5?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell LT5 runs at 1,014,634.2 J/TH — a difference of 8,800,180.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 90% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 1,014,634 J/TH).