Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell AE Max II
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell AE Max II |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 540.0 MH/s |
| 530 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 5,925,925.9 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 85 dB |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 12.5 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 29/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell AE Max II
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Goldshell AE-BOX II et le Goldshell AE Max II sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell AE Max II sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell AE Max II 900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 83% better power draw (530 vs 3,200 W)
- Goldshell AE Max II 40% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 5,925,926 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 59% better noise (35.0 vs 85.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 76% better weight (3.0 vs 12.5 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 504% more heat output (1,808 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 124% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 29.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell AE Max II |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,050 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$7.68 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$3,853 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$6,656 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$9,460 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AE Max II5,925,925.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell AE Max II: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell AE Max II: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell AE Max II: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell AE Max II?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH — a difference of 3,888,888.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 40% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 5,925,926 J/TH).