Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 360.0 GH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 180 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 500.0 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 614 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 500 J/TH). The Goldshell AE Max II holds the edge in niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 66567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 94% better power draw (3,200 vs 180 W)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 500 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 82% better weight (12.5 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 1678% more heat output (10,918 vs 614 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 14% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $340 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$0.42 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$493 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$646 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$799 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)Score: 33/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)500.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) is more profitable at $-0.42/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)?
The Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) scores 33/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,425.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 500 J/TH).